| |
This is an essay I
wrote for Deep West, a literary anthology recently published
by the Wyoming Center for the Book. I was very happy to be
included in this landmark publication, which is the first collection
of its kind to establish a sense of Wyoming’s literary history and
heritage.
Things of the World
When
I first came to Wyoming in 1981, I knew I would not be able to write
about this place right away. I knew also that I would want to
write about it, because I knew myself as a person who needed to be
rooted to a place and who wrote about things in relation to their
setting.
As I
was growing up in rural California, my sense of place was growing on
me without my being aware of it. I observed plants and
animals, I paid attention in school, and I listened to the family
stories. I grew up with a farming and ranching heritage, and
my sense of where I lived, like my sense of history, was
western. Mine was the country where the Spanish missionaries
had come, and the first vaqueros. It was the destination for
gold miners, wagon train emigrants, and Pony Express riders. It was the golden state, the culmination of westward
expansion. I stored up all the little bits I had learned on my
own, in school, and in all the anecdotes of my early years. Together they defined for me the place where I lived, the center of
the world. When I began to write, I wrote about the things I
knew.
When
I moved to Wyoming, the center moved. I still wrote, and do
write, about the other place as I knew it, but I also had to find
out about the new center. In many respects, this world was
like the one I had left. I moved to a small town with a J.C.
Penney, a post office, banks, bars, churches, stockyards, farm
implement dealers, and greasy-spoon restaurants. The local
farmers raised sugar beets, corn, alfalfa, beans, and wheat. I
knew those crops, just as I knew sheep and cattle and horses, which
dotted the new landscape with their familiar shapes.
But
despite some similarities, enough to help me feel grounded, I began
to process the new things. I had already told myself I needed
to take this country on its own terms, and I was open to them. I sensed right away that the air was different, and after I had been
here through a winter and spring, I realized the greens were of a
different hue. I am still conscious of this difference,
because I have not lost my earlier sense of place. Maybe the
lilac bushes and the ash trees and the corn stalks have the same
greens I knew before, but it seems as if even those greens have a
different tone. Perhaps it is a function of a different
sunlight, due to a different latitude and elevation. But certainly
the native greens of the countryside are different, especially the
native grasses and sagebrush.
Furthermore,
variation in color is more subtle here than in the place where I
used to work as a farm laborer, gardener, and landscaper. The
native plants had a broader range of green, I believe--or at least
brighter--and the domestic crops and yard plants certainly had a
greater variety. I can recall seeing, close together, a
windbreak of silver-green eucalyptus trees, a grove of dark green
orange trees, and an orchard of pale green peach trees--all with
dramatically different leaves as well. The climate was
hospitable to these immigrants from Australia, Spain, and the Middle
East.
The
color green is just one way of describing what I have come to
understand as an ascetic, spare way of life. I was already
familiar with the crops raised here, and I had worked in all of
them; but I had also worked in dozens of other crops, from chives to
boysenberries to oranges. I had tons of apricots and fresh
prunes pass through my hands, and I hauled hundreds of tons of
peaches with an orchard tractor and a four-wheeled trailer. I
hauled cannery tomatoes in huge gondola trailers, with watery juice
running out of the tail end like a fat cow pissing. In
contrast with such lavish diversity, and marked with fewer trees,
the landscape of Wyoming stretches out in what seems to be
simplicity. Again, the climate (including the latitude and the
elevation) favors less diversity.
In
some ways, the simplicity is an illusion, or a superficial
perception, for the ecosystem is complex. I just have to look
closer. But in other ways, the perception is valid. When
I first came here I had more trouble than before at learning
students' names--especially the young women. It seemed, at
least, as if most of them had the same color of hair (cut and combed
the same), the same complexion, and the same clothes. These
students were all named Kim and Kelly and Tammy. A few years
later they became Shelly and Lisa, then Jennifer and Jessica, then
Amber and Crystal. With less diversity in the economy, we
naturally have less diversity in population.
To
some extent, there is a same-mindedness. Many of the people in
this part of the country have eaten very few meats other than beef,
pork, chicken, and turkey. Many have never tasted lamb or
venison, much less domestic goat or rabbit, and they will scowl at
the mention of food they have not tried. Many of them do not
know what an abalone is, much less what it takes like. "This
is cow country," they say. "Eat beef." But even in that
credo there is some narrowness; many of these people would not touch
beef tongue or tripe.
In a
land where so many people share a taste for chicken-fried steak with
catsup, one is likely to find similarities in thought as well. One encounters widely held beliefs such as the federal government
needs to stay away, Californians are weird, road construction is
beneficial, and tourism is desirable. The latter two opinions
prevail in the face of the previous two because of a widespread
assumption that economic gain (in a world of low economic influx and
diversity) justifies a lot of inconveniences, indignities, and "hard
choices." People who hate the idea of a store selling girlie
magazines or of a bar being open on Sunday fight a losing battle
against the argument that it's hard to make a living here and we
need every chance we can get.
This
argument is based, among other things, in two major facts of life in
Wyoming: low population and inclement weather. People are
spread out at liberal distances, and the distances are emphasized by
the weather. These facts pervade every facet of our lives
here, even unto the sale of girlie magazines--we have a low
population of resident buyers, and our non-residents are seasonal,
so we need every chance we can get.
I
came to Wyoming because of the low population. I declared that
I wanted to live in a place where the cows out-numbered the people,
and I was heartily assured that this was such a place. I
learned soon afterwards that the antelope came in as a close third,
and that made me even happier.
Low
population is important to me. I don't care for large towns,
tall buildings, and heavy traffic. I don't like crowds or
machines. I like to live and write in a world of things, and I
like those things to be in their natural state as much as
possible. I always wanted to own my own place in the country,
where I could observe life close up and unbothered, where I could
write in peace.
Low
population makes it all possible for me. I can (if only
barely) afford to live on a small acreage with a horse outside my
window, geese in the winter skies, and wild plum trees in the
gully. If more people lived here, I would not have deer and
pheasants wandering through my horse pasture, nor would I be at
liberty to shoot the jackrabbits and gophers when they ravage the
trees and flowers and vegetables I have planted. (It all fits
together. Step aside from the main topic for a moment and ask,
why shoot jackrabbits and gophers? The answers: it's hard
enough to grow anything in this climate, it's good practice for
hunting, and I've got the freedom to do it.) Low population
makes it possible for me to hunt antelope, deer, and elk with some
sense of original purpose, just as it allows me to go camping
without making a reservation.
As
for the weather, it conditions everything we do. It reminds us
that we live in nature. It makes us take all of life
seriously, and it makes us pay close attention. Because of low
population a person can leave the keys in the car (and a gun in the
gun rack), but because of unpredictable weather, she won't leave the
window rolled down if she's going to be away from the vehicle for
very long. One bad hailstorm or one bad blizzard will put all
the pleasant days into perspective. Bad weather reminds us of
our own mortality and the need to write when we can, and it also
gives us plenty to write about.
Coming
from a temperate climate, I was worried about the weather. I
learned soon enough, however, that it was part of the whole scheme,
inseparable and interesting. I came here because I wanted to
live in nature, and the weather was part of what I came for. Once I had my own place in the country (even though I lived in a
mobile home on a wind-buffeted hilltop), I was sure I wanted to stay
here.
When
I got my own place I had been here three years, and I felt I had
taken in enough to be able to write about this world. On my
own place I continued in earnest, observing the hawks, the geese,
the deer, the rabbits, the toads. I took special interest in
the wild flowers. I wrote a poem entitled "Wild Rose of
Wyoming" and later developed the image more fully in a western novel
entitled Wild Rose of Ruby Canyon. My love of the blue
flax, the wild rose, and the pincushion cactus found its way into a
story called "Flowers for Rebecca." It has been the most
praised story of One Foot in the Stirrup, a collection of Old
West stories. Also during my first fifteen years in Wyoming, I
wrote several contemporary short stories that I brought together in
a collection called Antelope Sky. These stories reflect the
world around me as I have taken it in.
Where
I live is so closely integrated into what I write that I abhor the
idea of moving somewhere else, losing what I have here, and starting
over. Although it might seem tedious to live in a world in
which the children all have names like Jason and Jessica and parents
with names like Mike and Cathy, and who all together do not read
many books or bother to learn things that aren't required, these
people are real. They know, as I have come to know, that we
are all in it together. There aren't many of us, we're far
apart, and we share the same problems of dealing with the weather
and trying to make a living. And, despite the gossip of small
towns and rural areas, people pretty much leave each other
alone.
Such
an environment leaves me free to study what is below the surface
appearance of similarity. I do not have to be overpowered by
majestic splendor. I am interested in the coming and going of
the meadowlarks, the bloom of the cactus, the slow change of color
as cold weather sets upon the land. I am interested in how
people haul their saddles or transport their coyote-hunting
dogs. I ama fascinated by the intensity of a dedicated
cowgirl, the trust of the cottontails that eat dandelions on my
lawn.
This
place has grown into me, and I have grown into it. After I had
lived on my place in the country for a few years, I found myself
preferring the nature tones of the surrounding world--not only for
my house but also for my clothes. I quit buying checkered and
striped shirts. Even a solid maroon shirt, as I see it, is the
color of chokecherry juice; and my increasing inventory of tan,
grey, and sage green shirts is a conscious response to my wanting to
be in the landscape and not just on it. I know this shift in
taste is apparent in my writing, also, because I am a fairly visual
writer.
Sometimes
I still miss the quail and the oak trees, but I have been able to
transfer some of my interest to the meadowlark and the
cottonwood. I am glad this place has grown into me, and I am
glad I did not try to write about it too soon. I remember the
example of a professor from the dreaded East who took a teaching job
at UC Davis not long before I left that country. After he had
been there a little while he wrote a detective novel in which he
implied an understanding of the Sacramento Valley and the Bay
Area. I didn't care for the smug tone or for the errors in
detail. I came here with that lesson fresh in my head, and I
have been content to take things in slowly, over and over.
I
am inescapably a regional writer because I write about the common
details of my immediate world. I hope to write more about my
earlier region, rural California, because I am not done with some of
the feelings that correspond to things there. Similarly, I
hope to write about a part of Mexico I have become familiar with,
and I hope to get a chance to let it grow on me a little more. For the present, thanks to low population and bad weather, this is
the center of my world--the plains country of Wyoming. Here I
can ponder the world as I cook the deer steak I brought home myself,
dip into a jar of chokecherry jelly I made, and pause to listen to
the yapping of the coyotes, my closest neighbors. |
|